29th California Alfalfa Symposium
December
8- 9,1999
Radisson
Hotel, Fresno, CA
MOLYBDENUM,
COPPER AND SELENIUM
IN
ALFALFA AND OTHER FORAGES
Roland D. Meyer, Ralph L. Phillips and Daniel B.
Marcum
Roland
D. Meyer, Extension Soils Specialist, email: rdmeyer@ucdavis.edu, 129
Hoagland Hall, LAWR Dept., One Shields Ave., University of California, Davis, CA
95616; Ralph L. Phillips, UCCE Farm Advisor, Kern-Tulare Counties, 1031 S. Mt.
Vernon Ave., Bakersfield, CA 93307; Daniel B. Marcum, UCCE Farm Advisor, Shasta-Lassen
Counties, P.O. Box 9, McArthur, CA 96056; Published In: Proceedings, 29th
California Alfalfa Symposium, 8-9, December, 1999, Fresno, CA, UC Cooperative
Extension, University of California, Davis.
ABSTRACT
There
are a number of geographic areas in Northern California where molybdenum
concentrations are inadequate (<0.3 ppm) in alfalfa and other legumes to meet
the needs for high forage yield production. In contrast, much of the state south
of a line between San Francisco and Lake Tahoe may have forages with excessive
(> 10 ppm) molybdenum concentrations resulting in "molybdenosis" in
livestock. Several areas in five counties of Northeast California have been
identified as producing forages having low (<5 ppm) copper concentrations
with the remainder of the state having normal (5-15 ppm) or higher levels. Much
of the northern half of the state along with the eastern side of the San Joaquin
Valley and the Sierra range produce vegetation that has deficient to marginally
adequate selenium concentrations to meet the nutritional needs of domestic
livestock and several species of wildlife. The west side of the San Joaquin
Valley and coastal areas south of San Francisco to the Mexican border generally
has forages with marginally adequate to sufficient selenium concentrations. A
few areas, as in San Luis Obispo, Kern and Imperial counties have forages with
high selenium concentrations.
Key
Words: alfalfa, quality, utilization, molybdenum, copper, selenium, toxicities,
deficiencies.
INTRODUCTION
The
quality of alfalfa and other forages and utilization by different classes of
livestock or even certain species of wildlife involves the evaluation of many
characteristics. Tests to evaluate the energy, fiber type and composition,
protein and other nutrient concentrations are some of the measures used to
establish the relative feed value or quality of forages for livestock. In some
cases, either the deficiencies or excesses of certain elements dramatically
effect the value or quality of alfalfa and other forages fed to livestock. In
California and the Western United States we have numerous valleys that have been
formed geologically by the deposition of sediments from higher elevations. In
the more arid climates where rainfall amounts are less than 20 inches per year,
less leaching of soluble salts to greater soil depths will occur and the soluble
salts are moved to the soil surface and left behind as the moisture is
evaporated. In these situations, elements like sulfur in the sulfate form (S04~,
molybdenum in the molybdate form (Mo04-), and others may be present in soils in
rather high concentrations. Since the pH is often in the alkaline range a number
of these elements remain in the oxidized form and are easily taken up by a
number of plant species like alfalfa, other legumes and broadleaf plants as well
as grasses used for livestock forages. The objective of this presentation is to
delineate areas in California where excessive as well as deficient
concentrations of molybdenum, copper and selenium are present in forages and how
these concentrations effect plant and animal growth and production.
MOLYBDENUM
AND COPPER CONCENTRATIONS IN FORAGES
Animal
Concerns:
During
the mid to late 1940's, researchers identified molybdenum-induced copper
deficiency in livestock and some of the soil and plant characteristics causing
"molybdenosis" in Kern and other counties in the southern San Joaquin
Valley.1,2,3
Characteristic
signs of molybdenosis in cattle were straw-colored haircoat, diarrhea,
dehydration and general unthriftiness. Dry roughage fed to cattle on pastures
and bluestone (copper sulfate) in the drinking water were some of the early
recommendations to minimize the effect upon livestock. The application of
sulfur, ammonium sulfate and other acidifying materials should be tried to lower
the pH of alkaline soils was another recommendation. Using information gathered
from several surveys of forage analyses,4,5,6,7
the following concentrations of copper and molybdenum were suggested as
diagnostic criteria.8
|
|
Copper
(Cu) |
Molybdenum
(Mo) |
|
|
(ppm) |
(ppm) |
|
Copper
deficiency |
0.1-
5,0 |
0.1-
5.0 |
|
Normal |
5
-15 |
1-
5 |
|
Molybdenum
toxicity |
5
- 8 |
5
- 50 |
Surveys
were continued in California during the 1950's and 1960's with a more complete
understanding of where low copper and high concentrations of molybdenum in
forages might be expected.9 Copper concentrations in forages were found to be
less than 5 ppm in several areas of Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Sierra and Siskiyou
counties of northeast California. Toxic molybdenum concentrations in forages
were found in nearly all the San Joaquin Valley and Coastal counties south of
Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties as well as Inyo, Mono and other Southern
California counties. A more recent survey of previously sampled alfalfa fields
indicated that the degree of severity of the molybdenum-induced copper
deficiency in livestock has decreased. 10 In 1950, 53.5% of the 71
alfalfa fields sampled in Kern County had in excess of 10 ppm molybdenum and by
1985, all of the same or nearby 82 alfalfa fields had 10 ppm or lower molybdenum
concentrations. Even though the molybdenum concentrations were all 10 ppm or
less, in 20.5% of the alfalfa samples tested the molybdenum level was
sufficiently high that some classes of livestock may need supplemental copper
added to the diet. In an additional 24.4% of the samples; the elevated
molybdenum and lower copper concentrations may on occasion present animal growth
problems particularly if the forage also contains high (>0.3%) sulfur
concentrations.
Plant
Concerns:
A
number of plant analyses from alfalfa and other legumes, both annual and
perennial, taken from Northern California (north of a line between San Francisco
and Lake Tahoe) have indicated marginally adequate to deficient concentrations
(0.05-0.5 ppm) of molybdenum for maximum growth and dry matter yields. In
several cases applications of sodium molybdate at one pound per acre (0.4 lb
Mo/A) have resulted in significant yield increases (M. B. Jones, D. B. Marcum
and R. D. Meyer, unpublished data). Molybdenum responses have also been reported
in several vegetable (melon) crops on the West Side of the Sacramento Valley (H.
Schulbach and M. Murray, personal communication). The deficiency of molybdenum
is most easily identified in alfalfa and other legumes by taking a sample of the
upper one-third of approximately 40-60 stems at one-tenth bloom growth stage and
having the sample analyzed for molybdenum. If the molybdenum concentration is
less than 0.3 ppm it is likely that a plant growth response would be obtained
following an application of one pound per acre sodium molybdate (0.4 lb Mo/A).
Excessively high concentrations of molybdenum (>100-1000 ppm) in several
plant species have been reported. In some cases no symptoms of toxicity have
been reported. 1
SELENIUM
CONCENTRATIONS IN FORAGES
Animal
Concerns:
Selenium
deficiency in animals was first recognized in a number of
selenium‑responsive diseases such as white muscle disease in calves and
lambs.12
Since its
identification in California in the late 1950's and early 1960's, large numbers
of animals have be diagnosed as having inadequate selenium concentrations in the
blood.13,14 Selenium
concentrations in forage plants of less than 0.05 ppm are usually considered
deficient unless animals are receiving other sources of selenium from grain,
salt etc. Several researchers have delineated areas within California and the
Western United States where both toxicities and deficiencies are likely to
occur.10,15,16 Much
of the northern half of the state along with the eastern side of the San Joaquin
Valley and. the Sierra range produce vegetation that has deficient to marginally
adequate selenium concentrations to meet the nutritional needs of domestic
livestock and several species of wildlife. The west side of the San Joaquin
Valley and coastal areas south of San Francisco to the Mexican border generally
has forages with marginally adequate to sufficient selenium concentrations. A
few areas, as in San Luis Obispo, Kern and imperial counties have forages with
high selenium concentrations.
Plant
Concerns:
Although
selenium is taken up by plants, it has not been demonstrated to be essential for
plant growth. It is advantageous however to have adequate concentrations of
selenium in feeds as a basis for meeting the nutritional needs of animals. When
forages having less than 0.05 ppm selenium are the only feed provided to animals
they will usually show signs of lower weight gain and even white muscle disease.
Forages having greater than 0.1 ppm selenium are generally considered as having
adequate levels to meet the nutritional needs of animals.
REFERENCES
1.
Britton, J. W. and H. Goss. 1946. Chronic molybdenum poisoning in cattle.
J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 108:176-178.
2.
Barshad, I. 1948. Molybdenum content of pasture plants in relation to
toxicity to cattle. Soil Sci. 66:187-195.
3.
Cameron, H. S. and H. Goss. 1948. Effect of molybdenum on livestock in
permanent pastures. Calif Agric. 2:6.
4.
Parker, R. V. 1952. Survey of molybdenum concentrations in alfalfa. Kern
County Agricultural Extension Report of Work.
5.
Kubota, J., V. A. Lazar, L. N. Langan and K. C. Beeson. 1961. The
relationship of soils to molybdenum toxicity in cattle in Nevada. Soil Sci. Soc.
Amer. Proc. 25:227-232.
6.
Dye, W. B. 1962. A micronutrient survey of Nevada forage. University of
Nevada Bull. 227. pp 67.
7.
Kubota, J., V. A. Lazar, G. H. Simonson and W. W. Hill. 1967. The
relationship of soils to molybdenum toxicity in grazing animals in Oregon. Soil
Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 31:667-671. .
8.
Lesperance, A. L. 1967. Winning the battle against molybdenosis. Nevada
Ranch and Home Review 3:14.
9.
Clawson, W. J. 1973. Molybdenum in California's animal agriculture. The
Molybdenum Project. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. July 2, 1973. pp 14
10.
Phillips, R. L. and R. D. Meyer. 1993. Molybdenum concentration of
alfalfa in Kern County, California: 1950 versus 1985. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant
Anal. 24:2725-2731.
11.
"Gupta, U. C. 1997. Symptoms of molybdenum deficiency and toxicity
in crops, pp160-170. In:
Gupta, U. C. (ed.) Molybdenum in Agriculture. Cambridge University Press,
New York, NY.
12.
Muth, O. H., J: E. Oldfield, L. F. Remmert and J. R. Schubert. 1958.
Effects of selenium and vitamin E on white muscle disease. Science 128: 1090.
13.
Williams, J. D. 1980. A survey into selenium deficiency in cattle in
northern California. M.S. Thesis. University of California, Davis. pp 50.
14.
Dunbar, J. R., B. B. Norman and M. N. Oliver. 1987. Preliminary report on
the survey of selenium whole blood values of beef herds in twelve central and
coastal California counties. In: Selenium
Contents in Animal and Human Food Crops Grown in California. University of
California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3330, 81-83.
15.
Meyer, R D. and R. G. Burau. 1995. The geochemistry and biogeochemistry
of selenium in relation to its deficiency and toxicity in animals. Proceedings
Selenium in the Environment: Essential Nutrient-Potential Toxicant, Sacramento,
CA., May 31-June 2, 1995. pp 38-44.
16. Kubota, J. and W. H. Allaway: 1972. Geographic distribution of trace element problems. In: Mortvedt, J. J. (ed.) Micronutrients in Agriculture. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, WI. pp 525-554.